25 | 0 | 3 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
以汉中市2014—2023年环境质量和经济发展的统计数据为依据,基于环境库兹涅茨曲线理论,采用统计学分析方法建立了多种环境指标与汉中市人均GDP之间的最优拟合模型。研究结果表明,汉中市大气污染物中的PM10、PM2.5、NO2和O3的年均浓度与人均GDP呈现出倒“N”型曲线,CO的年均浓度与人均GDP的拟合曲线呈“N”型;大气中的SO2、地表水中的生化需氧量、氨氮、化学需氧量、总氮、总磷的年均浓度及工业三废排放量与人均GDP均呈现出较明显的倒“U”型关系。整体上看,现阶段汉中市环境质量呈现逐步向好的趋势,目前正处于巩固生态保护成果的关键阶段,仍面临一定的压力。建议通过加大环保投入、加强环境监管和治理、优化产业结构等手段促进环境与经济的长期协调发展。
Abstract:According to the statistical data of environmental quality and economic development of Hanzhong city from 2014 to 2023, the optimal fitting models between various environmental indicators and per capita GDP of Hanzhong city were established based on the statistical analysis and the theory of environmental Kuznets curve. The results of research showed that the average annual concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, NO2 and O3 in Hanzhong showed inverted N-shaped curves with per capita GDP. The concentration of CO showed a N-shaped curve. The average annual concentration of SO2 in the atmosphere and the concentration of biochemical oxygen demand, ammonia nitrogen, chemical oxygen demand, total nitrogen and total phosphorus in surface water showed inverted U-shaped curves. At the same time, the emissions of industrial waste gas, industrial wastewater and industrial waste residue showed obvious inverted U-shaped curves with the per capita GDP. On the whole, the environmental quality of Hanzhong showed a gradually better trend at this stage. It was at the crunch stage of consolidating achievement of the ecological protection with heavy pressure still exists. The long-term coordinated development of environment and economy can be promoted by increasing investment in environmental protection, strengthening environmental supervision and governance and optimizing industrial structure.
[1] 王甡.大连市环境库兹涅茨曲线分析[J].现代农业科技,2020(10):148-150.
[2] 夏利博,杜爽,田德存.黄河流域城市的环境库兹涅茨曲线分析[J].科技创新与应用,2022,12(11):24-28.
[3] 刘磊,杨全武.湖北省经济增长与环境污染的EKC曲线分析[J].湖北工业大学学报,2019,34(4):117-120.
[4] 王艳,赵立汉.安徽省工业发展与碳排放的EKC曲线模型分析及其影响因素研究[J].阜阳师范大学学报(自然科学版),2024,41(1):62-69.
[5] 傅俊越,周启刚.重庆市碳排放及主要污染物的环境库兹涅茨曲线特征研究[J].应用化工,2023,52(3):764-768.
[6] 郝玺龙,杨昆,杨露豪.山西省环境库兹涅茨曲线的实证分析[J].现代工业经济和信息化,2023,13(7):189-192.
[7] 刘佳琪,董怡,许明军,等.武汉市废水排放EKC曲线及驱动效应研究[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版),2022,43(2):89-94.
[8] AUNG T S,SABOORI B,RASOULINEZHAD E.Economic growth and environmental pollution in Myanmar:an analysis of environmental Kuznets curve[J].Environmental Science & Pollution Research,2017,24(2):1-15.
[9] 张慧,韩俊.中国东部地区经济增长与环境污染关系研究[J].环境科学导刊,2022,41(3):13-18.
[10] 韦茜.区域经济增长与环境污染程度评估研究[J].环境科学与管理,2022(2):189-194.
[11] 曹磊,刘珊,董小林,等.城市工业“三废”与经济发展的EKC联合分析[J].应用化工,2021,50(12):3452-3462.
[12] 王敏,黄滢.中国的环境污染与经济增长[J].经济学,2015,14(1):557-578.
[13] 林发照.珠三角城市群经济增长与环境污染关系研究[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报,2019,29(5):5-8.
[14] 夏百川,毕天云,陈长瑶.基于EKC理论的云南省经济增长与环境污染关系实证研究[J].生态经济,2021(11):201-208.
[15] 戴嵘.中国环境与经济增长关系的Kuznets曲线特征研究[D].南京:南京财经大学,2011.
[16] 赵慧娟.环境EKC曲线的区域差异性研究:基于地市级面板数据[D].上海:上海财经大学,2022.
基本信息:
DOI:
中图分类号:X821
引用信息:
[1]刘杰,屈勇,梁艳.汉中市环境库兹涅茨曲线实证研究[J].陕西理工大学学报(自然科学版),2025,41(03):43-49.
基金信息:
陕西省教育厅重点科学研究计划新型智库项目(23JT001); 陕西省哲学社会科学研究专项项目(2025YB0059)